Bandu2.com santhoshyadavnu » peoplethink - the blog of Santhosh Yadav N U India Log in

Create A Blog!

santhoshyadavnu
santhoshyadavnu : peoplethink
Its all abt wt people around u think..

** Share the blog **

General information

Address: http://santhoshyadavnu.bandu2.com

Creation: 13/11/2010 19:49
Update: 15/11/2010 06:08
Articles 3
Images 2
Comments 1
Visits of the week 2065
Total visits 631

i need ur opinion..
jealousy in love..

santhoshyadavnu :: peoplethink


Santhosh Yadav N U India has no other blog!
santhoshyadavnu - Santhosh Yadav N U India

United States - Santhosh Yadav N U India
34years
Position: 1638/56779 members

The items are sorted from newest to oldest!

bandu2 : menu_arrow.gif Article: i need ur opinion.. - 15/11/2010 06:08

i need ur opinion..After a gal n boy had sex with each other...who wl be more disturbed if they get apart or broken up..???

bandu2 : menu_arrow.gif Article: jealousy in love.. - 14/11/2010 16:24

jealousy in love..What's the difference between envy and jealousy? I spent years thinking they were the same thing until someone told me to think of the difference between a jealous husband and an envious husband. Envy is avaricious desire, wanting what someone else has. Jealousy is fear of loss that easily becomes aggressive and sometimes displaced defence. Both envy and jealousy are common in romantic situations, as the jealous lover fends off the envious suitor. So how does jealousy work in practice? Researcher Jon Maner and colleagues triggered feelings of jealousy in study subjects and watched what happened next. They found that the jealous person moves to a heightened sense of alertness as the scan the environment for signs of potential rivals. They look in particular for attractive faces and memorise these as potential threats, forming negative attitudes towards them. So if you are attractive, watch for the jealous types defending against you, even if you are wholly innocent. And if you are the 'jealous guy' (or gal) watch yourself -- your aggression may precipitate a change in affections in the object of your defensive attitude.

bandu2 : menu_arrow.gif Article: difference between management and leadership - 14/11/2010 16:08

What is the difference between management and leadership? It is a question that has been asked more than once and also answered in different ways. The biggest difference between managers and leaders is the way they motivate the people who work or follow them, and this sets the tone for most other aspects of what they do. Many people, by the way, are both. They have management jobs, but they realize that you cannot buy hearts, especially to follow them down a difficult path, and so act as leaders too. Managers have subordinates By definition, managers have subordinates - unless their title is honorary and given as a mark of seniority, in which case the title is a misnomer and their power over others is other than formal authority. Authoritarian, transactional style Managers have a position of authority vested in them by the company, and their subordinates work for them and largely do as they are told. Management style is transactional, in that the manager tells the subordinate what to do, and the subordinate does this not because they are a blind robot, but because they have been promised a reward (at minimum their salary) for doing so. Work focus Managers are paid to get things done (they are subordinates too), often within tight constraints of time and money. They thus naturally pass on this work focus to their subordinates. Seek comfort An interesting research finding about managers is that they tend to come from stable home backgrounds and led relatively normal and comfortable lives. This leads them to be relatively risk-averse and they will seek to avoid conflict where possible. In terms of people, they generally like to run a 'happy ship'. Leaders have followers Leaders do not have subordinates - at least not when they are leading. Many organizational leaders do have subordinates, but only because they are also managers. But when they want to lead, they have to give up formal authoritarian control, because to lead is to have followers, and following is always a voluntary activity. Charismatic, transformational style Telling people what to do does not inspire them to follow you. You have to appeal to them, showing how following them will lead to their hearts' desire. They must want to follow you enough to stop what they are doing and perhaps walk into danger and situations that they would not normally consider risking. Leaders with a stronger charisma find it easier to attract people to their cause. As a part of their persuasion they typically promise transformational benefits, such that their followers will not just receive extrinsic rewards but will somehow become better people. People focus Although many leaders have a charismatic style to some extent, this does not require a loud personality. They are always good with people, and quiet styles that give credit to others (and takes blame on themselves) are very effective at creating the loyalty that great leaders engender. Although leaders are good with people, this does not mean they are friendly with them. In order to keep the mystique of leadership, they often retain a degree of separation and aloofness. This does not mean that leaders do not pay attention to tasks - in fact they are often very achievement-focused. What they do realize, however, is the importance of enthusing others to work towards their vision. Seek risk In the same study that showed managers as risk-averse, leaders appeared as risk-seeking, although they are not blind thrill-seekers. When pursuing their vision, they consider it natural to encounter problems and hurdles that must be overcome along the way. They are thus comfortable with risk and will see routes that others avoid as potential opportunities for advantage and will happily break rules in order to get things done. A surprising number of these leaders had some form of handicap in their lives which they had to overcome. Some had traumatic childhoods, some had problems such as dyslexia, others were shorter than average. This perhaps taught them the independence of mind that is needed to go out on a limb and not worry about what others are thinking about you.